🔗 Share this article

A Danish citizen has been found guilty of uploading nude segments from protected movies and television shows on the social media platform Reddit.

Based on a police report reviewed by media outlets, the anonymous man posted 347 video excerpts of nude scenes in a subreddit he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million times.

The country's police confirm he has been given a seven-month suspended sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the man was charged under a seldom-invoked clause in Denmark's intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by taking the footage out of their intended setting, the man had harmed the artists' "moral rights".

He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted data.

From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit clips including over 100 female performers.

He shared them in the subreddit he was a administrator of.

According to the Denmark's copyright protection organization The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were encouraged to ask for excerpts of particular performers.

In last year, advocates filed the case to the police on behalf of the impacted artists, filmmakers and production companies, which resulted in the subreddit being closed down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of the performers whose nude content were shared in the community, told Danish broadcasters at the time she believed there was a difference between being seen unclothed in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The actress stated the uploads constituted "exploitation".

'An important message'

The defendant was arrested in fall 2024 and admitted guilty to the charges last month.

In a statement following the verdict, TRA head the organization's leader remarked the outcome sent an "important" message "indicating violations of creators' rights have repercussions".

The ruling is considered unique in Denmark for its application of the "moral rights" clause of the national copyright law, which specifies an creator's creation cannot be used in a way which violates their reputation.

Intellectual property specialist Dr Alina Trapova told BBC News the legal matter was "unusual" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

How the case could affect nations abroad is uncertain.

But she added there may be "an increasing number of such cases" in the future with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of one's creative output might be compromised with greater ease".